Henry Jones
May Lamb
10/19/22
EV 333 Dr. Gratz
Report on the December 22, 2021 - Jan 1, 2022 California Atmospheric River Event
Introduction
In December of 2021, two atmospheric river (AR) events within two weeks of one
another led to more than ten feet of snowfall throughout much of the Sierra Nevada mountains
across central and northern California (Putnam et al. 2021). Snowpack levels rapidly increased,
but lower elevations faced the brunt of extreme rain which led to landslides and flash floods
(Percy, N., Antonios, C. 2021). These storms brought unprecedented amounts of precipitation on
the Pacific coast, particularly in the mountains, and reached inland as far as Wyoming and
Colorado (Castelleno et al. 2022). The heaviest snowfall was seen in the second event, dating
December 22, 2021 to January 1st, 2022, near Lake Tahoe in California, where over ten feet of
snow fell in this short span according to the Castelleno et al., Center for Western Waters and
Weather Extremes (CW3E) detailed event summary. Snowpack surged statewide to 154% of
average annual snowpack and caused major travel disruptions and power outages, in addition to
flooding and landslides experienced at lower altitudes. The UC Berkeley Central Sierra Snow
Lab set a new total snowfall record for December snowfall of 214 inches, and most areas around
the Continental Divide reported above-normal snowpack conditions after January 1st (Castelleno
et al. 2022). While record precipitation events such as these bring many sociological dangers and
natural hazards such as flooding and mudslides, ARs are vital to the hydrological system in the
western US.
Along the western coast of North America, and in particular California, some 40-85% of
annual precipitation is a result of landfalling ARs and the orographic precipitation they bring
after uplift along the coastal and inland mountain ranges (Berwyn 2019). Upon reaching coastal
ranges, the AR-borne water vapor rises over the terrain, cools, and condenses to then fall as rain
or snow. Thus while interesting in their own right as meteorological phenomena, ARs are highly
correlated with drought, dry season wildfires, and are largely the lifeline of the entire hydrology
of these regions.
As defined by Ralph et al. (2018), ARs are long, thin filaments of significant water vapor
content which are several hundred kilometers wide and often one to three thousand kilometers in
length. A dedicated science of ARs has emerged in the last two decades as satellite imagery has
dramatically improved AR diagnostics and forecasting, and the immense hydrological
significance of ARs along the western coast of the US and other mountainous, arid locations has
been realized (Ralph et al. 2020). ARs often transport more water than the Amazon River in
concentrated water vapor, leading to immense amounts of precipitation (Berwyn 2019). Today,
AR researchers continue to investigate the physical mechanism responsible for AR genesis,
proliferation, and termination.
While originally thought of as a “channel flow” of intensely humid air originating in the
tropics, scientists are proving the actual dynamics of vapor transport to be more complex
(Sodemann et al. 2020). According to these researchers, the majority of AR-transported water
vapor arises from global-scale, longitudinal water vapor convergence along the mid-latitudes and
the subtropics, challenging the simplistic pipeline conception. Due to the rising of air masses
with poleward direction, water is continually condensed and replenished along the lifecycle of a
poleward atmospheric river. Despite the unknowns in the complexity of AR dynamics, Figure 1
(Ralph et al. 2020) illustrates the modern understanding of AR formation: cold fronts (typically
from polar regions) meet warm, humid air which is then uplifted in a cyclic manner to create
condensation. Given the advances in AR understanding, efforts have been made to standardize
ARs for forecasting purposes.
In light of the US west coasts’ tenuous relationship with ARs, scientists have developed a
comprehensive scale very similar to hurricane categorization to communicate the spectrum of
hazards possible. Key metrics for AR event intensity and duration include vertically integrated
water vapor transport (IVT) and vertically integrated water vapor (IWV) or total precipitable
water (TPW). IVT is mainly used in the AR scale as it depends less on surface elevation, is more
directly related to precipitation outcomes, and conveys vapor flux similar to land rivers. ARs are
identified with IVT values of 250 to 1250 kg m^–1 s^–1, whose five sublevels correlate with
weak(1), moderate(2), strong(3), extreme(4), and exceptional(5) level ARs. Category 3-5 ARs
represent the most dangerous storms with moderate to great risk of hazardous conditions, while
the lowest categories bring mostly beneficial precipitation (Ralph et al., 2019). This particular
event made landfall as a moderate to strong AR.
On December 22nd of last year, this AR made landfall over California, strengthening as it
spread across the southwestern US, and majorly contributed to a massive snow event. AR 2 and
3 conditions were observed over coastal Southern and Central California and the inland reach of
this AR created similar conditions in parts of Southern Arizona and Colorado (Castelleno et al.
2022). After the AR dissipated, a series of upper-level shortwaves brought further rain and snow
to California and the extended western states. Shortwaves are pressure waves embedded within
the planetary long waves caused by the uneven heating of the Earth’s surface by the Sun. These
waves are less than 3,700 miles long (long waves are generally 4,000-5,000 miles long) and their
high energy and velocity is responsible for their control of synoptic scale weather systems. In
fact, major precipitation bands are typically centered near short waves passing overhead
(Weather 2021). Thus while the AR was dissipating from December 25th to 31st, several
shortwave troughs aided by a stationary ridge over the Central Pacific Ocean traveled over
California (Castelleno et al. 2022) and dropped heavy precipitation and snow along the coastal
mountain ranges, the Cascades, the Sierra Nevada, and the Intermountain West.
These extreme snow levels in combination with high winds caused hazardous whiteout
driving conditions and major closures on highways, toppled trees, and consequent power outages
for thousands of people. The storms of this event fortunately did not cause widespread flooding,
but according to the Castelleno et al. (2022), multiple rivers rose above the action stage and the
snow runoff actually helped restore below-normal reservoir levels to near normal and combatted
ongoing drought and water shortages. Despite this, the danger of AR-related storms is
demonstrated in California’s history, including the Great Flood of 1862, which partially
destroyed Sacramento and the causeway failure of the Oroville Dam in 2017 (Alvi 2017, Dowd
2022). Furthermore, nearly half of all flood damage, costing around $23 billion, in the Western
United States between 1978 and 2017 was caused by only 10 of the most intense atmospheric
rivers during that time (Berwyn 2019). Global warming is already intensifying the rain and
snowfall from atmospheric rivers, and as the climate continues to warm these extreme ARs will
become wetter, bigger, and overall more intense and devastating for communities according to
Berwyn (2019). With regards to the late December 2021 AR and shortwave precipitation event,
this report is an investigation of the meteorological factors and dynamics of this record breaking
precipitation event, as well as the sociological impacts regarding climate change and climate
justice.
Methods
In conducting our analysis, we chose to include five figures (2-6) to best explain the
spatio-temporal evolution and dynamics of the extreme precipitation event including an AR and
strong upper-level short wave activity. With the abundance of publicly available water vapor
satellite imagery and the event analysis conducted at the Center for Western Water Extremes
(Castelleno et al. 2022), we synthesized these detailed data in conjunction with surface analyses
( NWS surface 2022) and HYSPLIT aerosol trajectories ( Hysplit 2022) to provide a continuous,
spatio-temporal analysis of the event. Figures 2 and 5 were acquired through the CW3E detailed
event summary (Castelleno et al. 2022). The animated figures 3 and 4(b) are animations of
MIMIC-TPW satellite data (Space 2021) which we created from a short Python Jupyter
notebook given by the Season Chaos blog (Besong 2022). To generate Figure 6, we computed
HYSPLIT back trajectories from initial locations 4000m (about 13000 ft) above mean sea level
in an area just west of Lake Tahoe (Figure 6(d)). The surface elevation is around 6000 ft on
average in the starting region, so an elevation of about 4000m above sea level was chosen to
investigate the connection between the surface air below and the upper level above at 500hPA in
Figure 5 which is about 18,200 ft above sea level ( Air Pressure 2015) according to the US
standard atmosphere. The starting region was chosen as it includes Truckee, California, from
which there are many meteorological observations, and Donner Summit on Interstate-80, which
recorded the highest snowfall totals over the course of the event (Rogers 2022).
Results
Sourced from the CW3E’s December 22- Jan 1 event summary (Castelleno et al. 2022),
Figure 2 and its animation linked in the caption show IVT and IWV vector plots off the coast of
California. The presence and magnitude of the landfalling AR which marked the start of this
record-breaking precipitation event is easily visualized with the shading of IVT and IWV
contours. Both water vapor content (b, IWV) and flux (a, IVT) enable easy visualization of the
atmospheric river which initiated this precipitation event. The low pressure system west of the
Oregon coast can be seen in both parts of the figure and also in the surface analysis in Figure 4.
The animation demonstrates this low pressure system contributed to the northeastern, inland
penetration of the AR. Figure 3 and its animation illustrate the evolution of the total precipitable
water (TPW) content over the eastern Pacific as the AR makes landfall along Oregon and
northern California and ultimately moves south until reaching the Baja peninsula. While TPW is
useful in understanding AR dynamics, Figure 3 does not provide insight into the heavy
precipitation resulting from upper-level shortwaves. Figures 5 and 6 illustrate this phenomenon
after the AR dissipated over central and northern California by December 24, 2021. The
comparison of the surface analysis and TPW at 03Z on December 23, 2021 in Figure 4 confirms
the importance of cold polar fronts in AR evolution which was given in Figure 1. As mentioned
previously, the surface low just west of the western Washington coast in Figure 4(b) confirms
this AR to be cyclonic in its evolution, as is typical of ARs impacting California (Sodemann,
2020). Figure 5 demonstrates the first three of five shortwaves which passed over California
immediately after the AR and brought heavy precipitation. As is expected, 500-hPA level
contour divergence occurs in the regions where absolute vorticity is highest which shows
potential for uplift and therefore precipitation. Finally, the calculated HYSPLIT trajectories in
Figure 6 confirm the presence of the stationary ridge over the northeastern pacific and the
multiple shortwave troughs over California in the days after the ARs dissipation.
Discussion
As seen in the Figure 3 animation, the event was initiated when a stream of moisture
from the eastern Pacific off the coast of British Columbia, CA moved south and narrowed and
intensified in the process. By December 19 (Fig. 3a), the water vapor intensified to be a weak,
likely unclassified AR making landfall on the northern coast of Oregon. As the TPW images
progress over 24 hour periods in Figure 3, the weak AR moved southward and intensified.
The strong, counter-clockwise wind vectors in the IWV plot in Figure 3, and the
tightening contours of increasing geopotential height in the surface analysis in Figure 4a point to
a very large high pressure system south of the Gulf of Alaska and a localized, yet intense low
pressure system off the coast of Northern California, where the AR made landfall on December
20. In the days prior, it's most likely the offshore low pressure system and cold front moved
further and further south toward California corresponding with the southward movement of the
TPW stream in Figure 3 (and animation). The positioning of the high and low pressure systems
thus acted as a perfect conveyer belt for cold polar air to wrap clockwise around the Gulf of
Alaska southward, until moving counterclockwise around the low pressure system (Fig. 4a).
After moving south of the low pressure system, the cold air was drawn north and eastward,
moving the cold front needed for AR formation (Fig. 1) to allow for the ARs landfall on
California as seen in the Figure 2 and 3 animations. Simultaneously, the low pressure system
acted as a warm conveyor belt, as moisture from the tropical latitudes is accelerated and brought
alongside the cold front barrier in a very common extratropical AR phenomenon (Sodemann
2020, Fig. 2.8). As mentioned in Sodemann (2020), cyclonic ARs such as these comprise the
most intense precipitation events in California, and their impact on historic flood seasons,
snowpack, and reservoir levels are well documented. As the Figure 2 and 3 animations show, the
AR moved southward and was largely absent from California by December 24, at which point
upper-level shortwaves began to dominate California’s weather.
As mentioned in the CW3E event summary and seen in Figures 5 and 6, while the
landfalling AR marked the beginning of this event, the upper-level shortwave activity in the
following days contributed similarly to the record precipitation. The short wave analysis by the
CW3E in Figure 5 shows significant upper-level troughing and the resulting increased absolute
vorticity over California on December 25-28. Shortwaves are known to be the primary
instigators of precipitation events on a global scale as they are essentially upper level fronts
which generate positive vorticity (Haby) and therefore the potential for uplift and/or instability.
It’s also likely that the AR-imported moisture in the previous few days provided a more humid
backdrop for the shortwaves, which further increased precipitation. After the fifth shortwave, the
troughing dissipated and moved southward marking the end of the precipitation event
(Castelleno et al. 2022). To further bolster our analysis of the short wave precipitation, we
computed Hysplit back-trajectories as seen in Figure 6 which clearly show the stationary ridge
over the northern Pacific and the subsequent troughing and uplift (noted in the bottom subplots
of subfigures a,b, and c). This stationary ridge likely played a large role in the numerous
shortwave events. By remaining still, the faster, more energetic shortwaves seem to have coursed
through the long waves in the area and repeatedly uplift air above the Sierra’s instead of
migrating along with a moving long wave. By January 1, 2022, California finally got a break
from precipitation but the event left a multitude of hazards remaining in its wake.
In addition to the meteorological and hydrological significance for California, this AR
and short-wave precipitation event had a significant sociological impact. The three day closure of
Interstate 80 and Highway 50 during the holidays is estimated to have cost $300 million in
goods, while at least 50,000 homes lost power in the Sierra Nevadas, with an estimated 21,000
who remained without power for eight days or more (Castelleno et al. 2022). This AR event in
late December was echoed by another causing widespread downpours later in January, triggering
mudslides that further damaged roads and homes. The deluge was severe enough to wash out a
150 foot section of Highway 1 in Big Sur, which is highly vulnerable near the sea (Berwyn
2022). With temperatures well below freezing, many feet of snow, and major interstates closed in
the areas hit hardest, conditions were dangerous for everyone, but particularly so for the most
vulnerable.
For the elderly, disabled, homeless, and poor, snow storms like this pose particularly
dangerous threats as there may not be places to go, people to help, or resources to find help. And
while this is true of every winter storm, extreme events such as these only exacerbate the risks
and lengthen discomfort. In addition, while the risk of large snowfall is immense, the threat of
urban flooding and hydrological insecurity is likely even greater.
California is especially vulnerable to atmospheric rivers with its Mediterranean climate,
experiencing wet winters and long, dry summers, leading to long term water scarcities and higher
likelihood of extensive drought periods. As noted previously, ARs are extremely influential in
California’s precipitation totals year to year, bringing 92% of the West Coast’s heaviest rainfall
days and accounting for 85% of California’s multi year precipitation variance (McDermott
2022). Climate change is clearly predicted to strengthen and increase the frequency and intensity
of ARs in years to come, which will have an increasingly huge impact on the land, ecosystems,
and communities in California. As warming oceans release more moisture to the air through
elevated evaporation, and warmer temperatures in the air enable the air itself to hold more
moisture, atmospheric rivers are poised to carry even greater amounts of water vapor and make
landfall as higher category events. A study in 2018 by Duane Waliser from the NASA Jet
Propulsion Lab shows a long-term trend of ARs bringing high levels of moisture to the shores
over the last 70 years. Even with variation in usual climate cycles like El Niño, Walisers
research shows ARs are expected to be about 25% wider and 20% longer than they are now
(Berwyn 2019). While new research continues to bring to light the impending dangers of ARs for
California, the state is also contending with rapid population and economic growth, significantly
increasing water demands as drought prevails, forcing State and Federal agencies to innovatively
balance water rights and supplies to meet these demands.
In anticipation of these conflicts and scarcities, California is working to mitigate flood
damage risk by improving floodplain management, while also recognizing the critical
importance of ARs in forming the base of the State’s entire water resources. In order to
accurately predict the extent of these future storms, it is critical that meteorologists and related
scientists learn more about ARs and their potential impacts and are doing just that to determine
the best methods for preparation and mitigation in the future. Current models predict that
megastorms could realistically flood thousands of square miles in a statewide disaster and cost
over $700 billion (Porter et al. 2010). At the forefront of mitigation efforts is therefore flood
protection, including improving runoff flows and their spatial distribution, as well as expanding
and better utilizing reservoirs and water storage spaces (Persad 2020). These strategies are slow
to plan and enact, and are very costly, but are extremely important and increasingly time
sensitive, as demonstrated by the intensity of the AR event in California last December that we
have discussed at length, and that broke snowpack records and endangered vulnerable
populations and affected entire communities.
M. Lamb and H. Jones collected data and compiled studies together. Lamb researched
atmospheric rivers and defined them, summarized the event in the introduction, and wrote the
discussion concerning climate justice, the impacts of ARs on people, and their relationship with
climate change. Lamb formatted sources into references below.
Jones performed HYSPLIT trajectory analysis in addition to generating figures 3 and 4(b),
collecting surface analysis images, and compiling figures. Jones contributed to the introduction
and wrote the methods, results, and meteorological components of the discussion.
Figures
Figure 1 . Vertical structure of a typical AR viewed over the Pacific ocean from the seminal work
of Ralph et al. 2004 . In (a), the large-scale frontal composition of an AR is seen as the moist
interface between a cold polar front and a warmer air mass of tropical or subtropical/mid-latitude
origin. The AR is heading towards the west coast of the US and can be seen to be related to the
cyclone near the Gulf of Alaska which appears to have spun the cold front in the AR into the
southern latitudes in a counter-clockwise manner. Ralph et al. 2004 present the modern
understanding of AR vertical structure in (b), showing the cold front and the warm, moist air
interface generating uplift and cloud condensation. The orange region and contour in (b) show
vertically integrated water vapor flux (IVP) which show that the most intense region of vapor
transport occurs at altitudes of about 1 km.
(a) (b)
Figure 2. Vertically integrated water vapor transport (IVT) and vertically integrated water vapor
(IWV) at 00Z December 20, 2021 provided in the CW3E event summary (Castelleno et al.
2022). IVT accounts for wind speed and direction while IWV is simply a measure of water vapor
content. IVT magnitudes of 250 kg m^-1 s^-1 is generally used as a minimum threshold for AR
diagnostics, and clearly the thin filament of IVT far exceeds this threshold in many places along
the AR. Animation can be viewed here .
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Figure 3 . Total precipitable water for the northern Pacific Ocean at 00Z on December 19-22,
2021(Besong 2022). We can clearly see the narrow band of water vapor flowing to the northeast
into northern California and Oregon and the general evolution of water vapor content over the
north eastern Pacific Ocean. Animation can be viewed here .
(a) (b)
Figure 4. Surface Analysis (a) and Total Precipitable Water satellite image from TPW-II (b,
Besong 2022) for 03.00Z December 23, 2021. The cold front seen in (a) clearly marks the
boundary of a significant change in humidity as the southern side of the boundary has much
greater total precipitable water (the scale for (b) is seen in Figure 4). While we expect colder
temperatures to cause precipitation and thus a decrease in TPW for a constant absolute humidity,
this cold front has the added significance of being within an AR where water vapor is being
transported along the boundary. At this point in the event, the AR itself is weakening while still
bringing significant precipitation.
Figure 5. Plots of 500mb levels along with wind barbs and absolute vorticity at 4pm PST on
December 25, 26, and 28 generated and used by the CW3E event summary (Castelleno et al.
2022). The plots are annotated to show the first three shortwave events which quickly followed
the AR and brought much of the precipitation for the event.
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Figure 6. Corresponding HYSPLIT back-trajectories for the first three shortwave events with a
starting elevation of 4000m above sea level at 00Z for December 26(a), 27(b), and 28(c). The
subplots below the trajectories indicate parcel altitude in meters above sea level at the
corresponding time.
References
Berwyn, B. (2019, December 5). Atmospheric rivers fuel most flood damage in the U.S. West.
climate change will make them worse. Inside Climate News.
https://insideclimatenews.org/news/05122019/atmospheric-rivers-climate-change-flood-
mudslide-risk-rising-california-west/
Berwyn, B. (2022, February 2). A surge from an atmospheric river drove California's latest
climate extremes . Inside Climate News.
https://insideclimatenews.org/news/02022021/a-surge-from-an-atmospheric-river-drove-c
alifornias-latest-climate-extremes/?gclid=Cj0KCQjw166aBhDEARIsAMEyZh7nOArRt
LFZiRWeMM5shstoujGE2rYXB45VHJPJu1B8hBn_ikSdgEYaAguNEALw_wcB
Besong, K. (2022, January 30). Satellite pull and plot: integrated water vapor.
Github. https://github.com/seasonedchaos/seasonedchaos_codes/blob/main/
IWV_historical_gifplotter.ipynb
Castelleno, C., Hecht, C., & Roj, S. (2022, January 5). CW3E event summary: 22 December 2021
– 1 January 2022 . Center for Western Weather and Water Extremes.
https://cw3e.ucsd.edu/cw3e-event-summary-22-december-2021-1-january-2022/
Corringham, T. W., Ralph, F. M., & Gershunov, A. (2019). Atmospheric rivers drive flood
damages in the western United States. Science Advances , 5 (12).
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax4631
Dowd, K. (2022, January 11). The flood that wiped out California . San Francisco Gate.
https://www.sfgate.com/weather/article/deadly-1862-flood-wiped-out-california-1676139
0.php
Haby, J. (n.d.). PRESSURE TROUGHS AND SHORTWAVES. www.theweatherprediction.com.
Retrieved October 19, 2022, from http://www.theweatherprediction.com/habyhints/14/
Hysplit air resources lab [Map]. (2022, September 2). Air Resources Laboratory.
https://www.ready.noaa.gov/HYSPLIT.php
Alvi, I. (2017). Oroville Dam (California, 2017) | Case Study | ASDSO Lessons Learned .
Damfailures.org. https://damfailures.org/case-study/oroville-dam-california-2017/
McDermott TKJ. Global exposure to flood risk and poverty. Nat Commun. 2022 Jun
28;13(1):3529. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30725-6. PMID: 35764615; PMCID:
PMC9239995.
Air Pressure at Altitude Calculator . (2015).
Mide.comhttps://www.mide.com/air-pressure-at-altitude-calculator
Percy, N., & Antonios, C. (2021, December 30). Grapevine reopens after strong storm leads to
road closures, mudslide and wrecks around the region . The Mercury News.
https://www.mercurynews.com/2021/12/30/heavy-storm-leads-to-grapevine-closure-mud
slide-wrecks-around-region-2/
Persad, G.G., Swain, D.L., Kouba, C. et al. Inter-model agreement on projected shifts in
California hydroclimate characteristics critical to water management. Climatic Change
162, 1493–1513 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02882-4
Porter, Keith, Wein, Anne, Alpers, Charles, Baez, Allan, Barnard, Patrick, Carter, James, Corsi,
Alessandra, Costner, James, Cox, Dale, Das, Tapash, Dettinger, Michael, Done, James,
Eadie, Charles, Eymann, Marcia, Ferris, Justin, Gunturi, Prasad, Hughes, Mimi, Jarrett,
Robert, Johnson, Laurie, Dam Le-Griffin, Hanh, Mitchell, David, Morman, Suzette,
Neiman, Paul, Olsen, Anna, Perry, Suzanne, Plumlee, Geoffrey, Ralph, Martin, Reynolds,
David, Rose, Adam, Schaefer, Kathleen, Serakos, Julie, Siembieda, William, Stock,
Jonathan, Strong, David, Sue Wing, Ian, Tang, Alex, Thomas, Pete, Topping, Ken, and
Wills, Chris; Jones, Lucile, Chief Scientist, Cox, Dale, Project Manager, 2011, Overview
of the ARkStorm scenario: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2010-1312, 183 p.
and appendixes [http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2010/1312/].
Putnam, Snell, Russell. (2021). Storm Summary Archive . www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov.
https://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/storm_summaries/2021/storm20/storm20_archive.shtml
Ralph, F. M., Dettinger, M. D., & Cairns, M. M. (2018). Defining "Atmospheric river": How the
glossary of meteorology helped resolve a debate. Bulletin of the American
Meteorological Society , 99 (4), 837-839. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0157.1
Ralph, F. M., Dettinger, M. D., Schick, L. J., & Anderson, M. L. (2020). Introduction to
Atmospheric Rivers. Atmospheric Rivers , 1–13.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28906-5_1
Ralph, F. M., Rutz, J. J., & Cordiera, J. M. (2019). A scale to characterize the strength and
impacts of atmospheric rivers. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , 100 (2),
269-289. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0023.1
Rogers, P. (2022, January 31). California drought: Sierra Nevada snowpack falls below average
after dry January . The Mercury News.
https://www.mercurynews.com/2022/01/31/california-drought-sierra-nevada-snowpack-f
alls-below-average/.
Sodemann, H., Wernli, H., Knippertz, P., Cordeira, J. M., Dominguez, F., Guan, B., Hu, H.,
Ralph, F. M., & Stohl, A. (2020). Structure, Process, and Mechanism. Atmospheric
Rivers , 15–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28906-5_2
Space Science and Engineering Center. (2021, December). Total precipitable water [Map].
MIMIC-TPW.
https://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/real-time/mtpw2/product.php?color_type=tpw_nrl_colors&pr
od=global2&timespan=24hrs&anim=html5
Weather Prediction Center Web Team. (2021, December 28). Storm summary . National Weather
Service Weather Prediction Center. Retrieved October 18, 2022, from
https://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/storm_summaries/2021/storm20/storm20_archive.shtml
WPC surface analysis zoom, pan, animation and archives . (2022). www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov.
https://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/html/sfc-zoom.php